Students become much more concerned with accuracy when their research is posted online
FREDERICTON, May 30 /CNW/ - A student writing an essay for their teacher may be tempted to plagiarize or leave facts unchecked. A new study shows that if you ask that same student to write something that will be posted on Wikipedia, he or she suddenly becomes determined to make the work as accurate as possible, and may actually do better research.
 |
| Brenna Gray, Image from Douglas College. |
Brenna Gray, an instructor at Douglas College in New Westminster, B.C., was presenting the results of the study at the 2011 Congress of the Canadian Federation for the Humanities and Social Sciences at the University of New Brunswick in Fredericton.
She became interested in why students seem to adopt some technological innovations (Wikipedia, for example) and reject things their schools would like them to use, such as the student-teacher interface Blackboard. Gray says it's easy to criticize Wikipedia because of the unstructured way it is set up.
She says despite its faults, it does promote solid values for its writers, including precise citations, accurate research, editing and revision.
"Those ideals are the ones we espouse as English instructors," she said.
She decided to get first-year students in an English class to write short biographies of Canadian writers that would then be posted on Wikipedia.
What she found was that the moment the students realized their work was going public in a forum over which they had no control, they took the work a lot more seriously. They became concerned, for example, with the accuracy of facts.
Gray says it's not only the fact that their work was going public that stimulated the students, it was the realization that in producing the Wikipedia entries they were acquiring skills that were transferable to other parts of their lives.
Gray says students, like most of the rest of us, are more time-crunched than ever. They have to prioritize, and are therefore reluctant to spend time learning skills that aren't useful outside school. That includes online tools like Blackboard, which they perceive as having no relevance to other parts of their life.
Because the Wikipedia skills are perceived as transferable, students became interested in acquiring them. And they were willing to work to Wikipedia's standards.
Gray says teachers need to talk about Wikipedia and how it can be used.
"The purpose of my paper is to start a discussion about it," she said.
Get more from the 2011 Congress of the Humanities and Social Sciences
Organized by the Canadian Federation for the Humanities and Social Sciences, the annual Congress of the Humanities and Social Sciences brings together scholars, graduate students, practitioners, and policy-makers to share groundbreaking research and examine the most important social and cultural issues of the day. This year's Congress is co-hosted by the University of New Brunswick and St. Thomas University and runs from May 28 to June 4.
The Congress program includes original research from across disciplines in the humanities and social sciences, providing a great collection of expert sources and innovative story leads. If you are interested in accessing the latest research in the social sciences and humanities, please contact us to be added to our mailing list.
www.congress 2011.ca
For further information: or interview requests, Ryan Saxby Hill, rsaxbyhill@fedcan.ca, 506-447-3176 (media room), 613-894-7635 (mobile)
This is extremely interesting research that was recently done. I had never thought about the true value of Wikipedia, especially as a teaching tool until this course. It is very true, as I learned first hand, that a student is more likely to cite properly and have accurate research if their work is going to be posted on the world wide web. It will be very interesting to see how much the influence of Wikipedia grows in the field of education in the next couple of years!
ReplyDelete